Respiratory syncytial virus infection in adults: Differences with influenza.

INTRODUCTION: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes an acute respiratory illness similar to influenza, although there are few data comparing both of them in adults. The existence of clinical differences between these two infections could have implications for their management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study including 63 adults with positive PCR for RSV and 221 for influenza during winter 2018-2019. Epidemiological, clinical characteristics and outcomes were contrasted between both groups. RESULTS: Compared to influenza, RSV-positive patients presented a higher association with active neoplasia (OR=2.9; 95% CI: 1.2-6.9), dependence for basic activities of daily living (OR=3.4; 95% CI: 1.4-8.2) and immunosuppression due to chronic glucocorticoid administration (OR=7.6; 95% CI: 1.6-36.1). At diagnosis, fever was less common (OR=0.3; 95% CI: 0.2-0.7), and C-reactive protein level ≥100mg/l was more frequent (OR=2.1; 95% CI: 1.0-4.5). They developed bacterial co-infection by Staphylococcus aureus in a higher proportion (OR=8.3; 95% CI: 1.5-46.9) and presented a greater need for admission to the intensive care unit (OR=5.4; 95% CI: 1.4-19.2). CONCLUSION: RSV is an important cause of respiratory illness in adults during the influenza season. It especially affects vulnerable patients with chronic underlying diseases, and has a higher morbidity than influenza. For all these reasons, specific detection, prevention and treatment of RSV is necessary in order to reduce the consumption of health care resources due to RSV disease in adults.

Neuropathic post-COVID pain symptomatology is not associated with serological biomarkers at hospital admission and hospitalization treatment in COVID-19 survivors.

Objective: Evidence suggests that individuals who had survived to coronavirus disease, 2019 (COVID-19) could develop neuropathic post-COVID pain. This study investigated the association of serological biomarkers and treatments received during hospitalization with development of neuropathic-associated symptoms. Methods: One hundred and eighty-three (n = 183) previously hospitalized COVID-19 survivors during the first wave of the pandemic were assessed in a face-to-face interview 9.4 months after hospitalization. Nineteen serological biomarkers, hospitalization data, and treatment during hospitalization were obtained from medical records. Neuropathic pain symptoms (Self-Report Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Scale), sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index), pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale) and anxiety/depressive levels (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) were assessed. Results: The prevalence of post-COVID pain was 40.9% (n = 75). Fifteen (20%) patients reported neuropathic symptoms. Overall, no differences in hospitalization data and serological biomarkers were identified according to the presence or not of neuropathic-associated symptoms. Patients with post-COVID pain had the highest neutrophil count, and post hoc analysis revealed that patients with neuropathic post-COVID associated symptoms had lower neutrophil count (p = 0.04) compared with those without neuropathic pain, but differences were small and possible not clinically relevant. No differences in fatigue, dyspnea, brain fog, anxiety or depressive levels, poor sleep, or pain catastrophism between patients with and without neuropathic symptoms were found. Conclusion: It seems that neuropathic-like post-COVID pain symptoms are not associated with neither of assessed serological biomarkers at hospital admission nor hospitalization treatments received in this cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 survivors.

Serological Biomarkers at Hospital Admission and Hospitalization Treatments Are Not Related to Sensitization-Associated Symptoms in Patients with Post-COVID Pain.

Current evidence suggests that a group of patients who had survived coronavirus disease, 2019 (COVID-19) and developed post-COVID pain can exhibit altered nociceptive processing. The role of serological biomarkers and hospitalization treatments in post-COVID pain is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association of serological biomarkers and treatments received during hospitalization with sensitization-associated symptoms in COVID-19 survivors with post-COVID pain. One hundred and eighty-three (n = 183) patients who had been hospitalized due to COVID-19 in one urban hospital of Madrid (Spain) during the first wave of the pandemic were assessed in a face-to-face interview 9.4 (SD 3.4) months after hospitalization. Levels of 19 serological biomarkers, hospitalization data, and treatments during hospitalization were obtained from hospital records. Sensitization-associated symptoms (Central Sensitization Inventory, CSI), sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI), pain catastrophism (Pain Catastrophizing Scale), and anxiety/depressive level (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS) were assessed. The prevalence of post-COVID pain was 40.9% (n = 75). Twenty-nine (38.6%) patients had sensitization-associated symptoms. Overall, no differences in hospitalization data and serological biomarkers were identified according to the presence of sensitization-associated symptoms. The analysis revealed that patients with sensitization-associated symptoms exhibited higher lymphocyte count and lower urea levels than those without sensitization-associated symptoms, but differences were small. Pain catastrophism and depressive levels, but not fatigue, dyspnea, brain fog, anxiety levels, or poor sleep, were higher in individuals with sensitization-associated symptoms. In conclusion, this study revealed that sensitization-associated post-COVID pain symptoms are not associated with serological biomarkers at hospital admission and hospitalization treatments received.

Executive summary consensus statement of imported diseases group (GEPI) of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) and the Spanish Society of Tropical Medicine and International Health (SETMSI), on the diagnostic and treatment of imported schistosomiasis.

Schistosomiasis is a highly prevalent disease, especially in immigrant populations, and is associated with significant morbidity and diagnostic delays outside endemic areas. For these reasons, the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) and the Spanish Society of Tropical Medicine and International Health (SEMTSI) have developed a joint consensus document to serve as a guide for the screening, diagnosis and treatment of this disease outside endemic areas. A panel of experts from both societies identified the main questions to be answered and developed recommendations based on the scientific evidence available at the time. The document was reviewed by the members from both societies for final approval.

Infección por virus respiratorio sincitial en adultos: diferencias con la gripe / Respiratory syncytial virus infection in adults: Differences with influenza

Introducción: El virus respiratorio sincitial (VRS) produce una enfermedad respiratoria aguda parecida a la gripe, aunque en adultos existen pocos datos que las comparen. La existencia de diferencias clínicas entre ambas infecciones podría conllevar implicaciones en su manejo. Materiales y métodos: Estudio observacional de cohortes retrospectivo incluyendo 63 adultos con PCR positiva para VRS y 221 para gripe durante el invierno 2018-2019. Se contrastaron las características epidemiológicas, clínicas y desenlaces entre ambos grupos. Resultados: En comparación con la gripe los pacientes VRS positivos asociaron mayor relación con neoplasia activa (OR=2,9; IC 95%: 1,2-6,9), dependencia para las actividades básicas de la vida diaria (OR=3,4; IC 95%: 1,4-8,2) e inmunosupresión por administración crónica de glucocorticoides (OR=7,6; IC 95%: 1,6-36,1). Al diagnóstico era menos común la presencia de fiebre (OR=0,3; IC 95%: 0,2-0,7) y más frecuente un nivel de proteína C reactiva≥100mg/l (OR=2,1; IC 95%: 1,0-4,5). Desarrollaron coinfección bacteriana por Staphylococcus aureus en mayor proporción (OR=8,3; IC 95%: 1,5-46,9) y presentaron una mayor necesidad de ingreso en la unidad de cuidados intensivos (OR=5,4; IC 95%: 1,4-19,2). Conclusión: El VRS es una causa importante de enfermedad respiratoria en adultos durante la época de gripe. Afecta especialmente a pacientes vulnerables con enfermedades crónicas de base, y presenta una morbilidad clínica superior a la gripe. Por todo ello es necesaria la detección, prevención y tratamiento específicos del VRS con el objetivo de reducir el consumo de recursos sanitarios que supone la enfermedad por VRS en adultos.(AU)

Introduction: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) causes an acute respiratory illness similar to influenza, although there are few data comparing both of them in adults. The existence of clinical differences between these two infections could have implications for their management. Materials and methods: Retrospective observational cohort study including 63 adults with positive PCR for RSV and 221 for influenza during winter 2018–2019. Epidemiological, clinical characteristics and outcomes were contrasted between both groups. Results: Compared to influenza, RSV-positive patients presented a higher association with active neoplasia (OR=2.9; 95% CI: 1.2–6.9), dependence for basic activities of daily living (OR=3.4; 95% CI: 1.4–8.2) and immunosuppression due to chronic glucocorticoid administration (OR=7.6; 95% CI: 1.6–36.1). At diagnosis, fever was less common (OR=.3; 95% CI: .2–.7), and C-reactive protein level ≥100mg/L was more frequent (OR=2.1; 95% CI: 1.0–4.5). They developed bacterial co-infection by Staphylococcus aureus in a higher proportion (OR=8.3; 95% CI: 1.5–46.9) and presented a greater need for admission to the intensive care unit (OR=5.4; 95% CI: 1.4–19.2). Conclusion: RSV is an important cause of respiratory illness in adults during the influenza season. It especially affects vulnerable patients with chronic underlying diseases, and has a higher clinical morbidity than influenza. For all these reasons, specific detection, prevention and treatment of RSV is necessary in order to reduce the consumption of health care resources due to RSV disease in adults.(AU)

Experiencia con el uso de dalbavancina en la infección profunda de pie diabético / Experience in the use of dalbavancin in diabetic foot infection

Objetivo: Describir la experiencia clínica con dalbavancina en el tratamiento de la infección de pie diabético en una unidad multidisciplinar de un hospital de segundo nivel. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo de pacientes con infección de pie diabético tratados con dalbavancina en la Unidad de Pie Diabético del Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón de septiembre de 2016 a diciembre de 2019. Se recogieron parámetros demográficos y comorbilidades, características de la infección y del tratamiento con dalbavancina. Se estimó la tasa de curación a los 90 días tras finalizar el tratamiento. Resultados: Un total de 23 pacientes con infección de pie diabético (osteomielitis) fueron tratados con dalbavancina; 19 eran hombres con una edad media de 65 años. Los microorganismos más frecuentemente aislados fueron Staphylococcus aureus (11) y Corynebacterium striatum (7). En 22 casos se usó dalbavancina como terapia de segunda elección, en 11 debido a toxicidad de otros antibióticos. La mediana de duración del tratamiento fue de 5 (4-7) semanas; la dosis más frecuente de dalbavancina (8 pacientes) fue de 1.000mg seguido de 500mg semanales durante 5 semanas. Tres pacientes presentaron efectos secundarios leves (náuseas y molestias gastrointestinales). A los 90 días de finalizar el tratamiento, el 87% (20) de los pacientes se curaron (IC95%: 65,2-94,52%). Conclusión: Los pacientes con osteomielitis por microorganismos grampositivos que recibieron como parte del tratamiento multidisciplinar antibioterapia con dalbavancina tuvieron una elevada tasa de curación, con una adecuada tolerancia y escasos efectos secundarios. Dalbavancina ofrece una alternativa segura en el tratamiento de la infección profunda de pie diabético.(AU)

Objective: To describe the clinical experience with dalbavancin in the treatment of diabetic foot infection in a multidisciplinary unit of a second level hospital. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive study was made with all patients with diabetic foot infection treated with dalbavancin in the Diabetic Foot Unit of Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, covering the period from September 2016 to December 2019. Demographic parameters and comorbidities, characteristics of the infection and treatment with dalbavancin were recorded. The cure rate was estimated at 90 days after finishing the treatment. Results: A total of 23 patients with diabetic foot infection (osteomyelitis) started treatment with dalbavancin, 19 were men and the mean age was 65 years. The microorganisms most frequently isolated for the indication of treatment with dalbavancin were Staphylococcus aureus (11) and Corynebacterium striatum (7). Dalbavancin was used as a second choice therapy in 22 cases, in 11 due to toxicity from other antibiotics. The median duration of treatment was 5 (4-7) weeks; the most frequent dose of dalbavancin (8 patients) was 1000mg followed by 500mg weekly for 5 weeks. 3 patients presented mild side effects (nausea and gastrointestinal discomfort). At 90 days after completion of dalbavancin therapy, 87% (20) of the patients were cured (95% CI: 65.2%-94.52%). Conclusion: Patients with osteomyelitis due to gram-positive microorganisms who received as part of the multidisciplinary antibiotic treatment with dalbavancin, had a high rate of cure with adequate tolerance and few side effects. Dalbavancin offers a safe alternative in treating deep diabetic foot infection.(AU)

Experience in the use of dalbavancin in diabetic foot infection.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical experience with dalbavancin in the treatment of diabetic foot infection in a multidisciplinary unit of a second level hospital. METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive study was made with all patients with diabetic foot infection treated with dalbavancin in the Diabetic Foot Unit of Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, covering the period from September 2016 to December 2019. Demographic parameters and comorbidities, characteristics of the infection and treatment with dalbavancin were recorded. The cure rate is estimated at 90 days after finishing the treatment. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients with diabetic foot infection (osteomyelitis) started treatment with dalbavancin, 19 were men and the mean age was 65 years. The microorganisms most frequently isolated for the indication of treatment with dalbavancin were Staphylococcus aureus (11) and Corynebacterium striatum (7). Dalbavancin was used as a second choice therapy in 22 cases, in 11 due to toxicity from other antibiotics. The median duration of treatment was 5 (4-7) weeks; the most frequent dose of dalbavancin (8 patients) was 1000 mg followed by 500 mg weekly for 5 weeks. 3 patients presented mild side effects (nausea and gastrointestinal discomfort). At 90 days after completion of dalbavancin therapy, 87% (20) of the patients were cured (95% CI: 65.2%-94.52%). CONCLUSION: Patients with osteomyelitis due to gram-positive microorganisms who received as part of the multidisciplinary antibiotic treatment with dalbavancin, had a high rate of cure with adequate tolerance and few side effects. Dalbavancin offers a safe alternative in treating deep diabetic foot infection.

Fatigue and Dyspnoea as Main Persistent Post-COVID-19 Symptoms in Previously Hospitalized Patients: Related Functional Limitations and Disability.

BACKGROUND: Multicentre studies focussing on specific long-term post-COVID-19 symptoms are scarce. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the levels of fatigue and dyspnoea, repercussions on daily life activities, and risk factors associated with fatigue or dyspnoea in COVID-19 survivors at long term after hospital discharge. METHODS: Age, gender, height, weight, symptoms at hospitalization, pre-existing medical comorbidity, intensive care unit admission, and the presence of cardio-respiratory symptoms developed after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection were collected from patients who recovered from COVID-19 at 4 hospitals in Madrid (Spain) from March 1 to May 31, 2020 (first COVID-19 wave). The Functional Impairment Checklist was used for evaluating fatigue/dyspnoea levels and functional limitations. RESULTS: A total of 1,142 patients (48% women, age: 61, standard deviation [SD]: 17 years) were assessed 7.0 months (SD 0.6) after hospitalization. Fatigue was present in 61% patients, dyspnoea with activity in 55%, and dyspnoea at rest in 23.5%. Only 355 (31.1%) patients did not exhibit fatigue and/or dyspnoea 7 months after hospitalization. Forty-five per cent reported functional limitations with daily living activities. Risk factors associated with fatigue and dyspnoea included female gender, number of pre-existing comorbidities, and number of symptoms at hospitalization. The number of days at hospital was a risk factor just for dyspnoea. CONCLUSIONS: Fatigue and/or dyspnoea were present in 70% of hospitalized COVID-19 survivors 7 months after discharge. In addition, 45% patients exhibited limitations on daily living activities. Being female, higher number of pre-existing medical comorbidities and number of symptoms at hospitalization were risk factors associated to fatigue/dyspnoea in COVID-19 survivors 7 months after hospitalization.

Diabetes and the Risk of Long-term Post-COVID Symptoms.

This study investigated the association of diabetes in patients who recovered from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection with the presence of long-term post-coronavirus disease (COVID) symptoms. A case-control study that included individuals hospitalized during the first wave of the pandemic was conducted. Patients with a previous diagnosis of diabetes and under medical control were considered case subjects. Two age- and sex-matched patients without presenting diabetes per case subject were recruited as control subjects. Hospitalization and clinical data were collected from hospital medical records. Patients were scheduled for a telephone interview. A list of post-COVID symptoms was systematically evaluated, but participants were invited to freely report any symptom. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index were used to assess anxiety and depressive symptoms, and sleep quality, respectively. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models were constructed. Overall, 145 patients with diabetes and 144 control subjects without diabetes who had recovered from COVID-19 were assessed at 7.2 (SD 0.6) months after hospital discharge. The number of post-COVID symptoms was similar between groups (incident rate ratio 1.06, 95% CI 0.92-1.24, P = 0.372). The most prevalent post-COVID symptoms were fatigue, dyspnea on exertion, and pain. No between-groups differences in any post-COVID symptom were observed. Similarly, no differences in limitations with daily living activities were found between patients with and without diabetes. Diabetes was not a risk factor for experiencing long-term post-COVID symptoms.

Role of asymptomatic bacteriuria on early periprosthetic joint infection after hip hemiarthroplasty. BARIFER randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate preoperative asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) treatment to reduce early-periprosthetic joint infections (early-PJIs) after hip hemiarthroplasty (HHA) for fracture. METHODS: Open-label, multicenter RCT comparing fosfomycin-trometamol versus no intervention with a parallel follow-up cohort without ASB. PRIMARY OUTCOME: early-PJI after HHA. RESULTS: Five hundred ninety-four patients enrolled (mean age 84.3); 152(25%) with ASB (77 treated with fosfomycin-trometamol/75 controls) and 442(75%) without. Despite the study closed without the intended sample size, ASB was not predictive of early-PJI (OR: 1.06 [95%CI: 0.33-3.38]), and its treatment did not modify early-PJI incidence (OR: 1.03 [95%CI: 0.15-7.10]). CONCLUSIONS: Neither preoperative ASB nor its treatment appears to be risk factors of early-PJI after HHA. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: Eudra CT 2016-001108-47.

Experience in the use of dalbavancin in diabetic foot infection. / Experiencia con el uso de dalbavancina en la infección profunda de pie diabético.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical experience with dalbavancin in the treatment of diabetic foot infection in a multidisciplinary unit of a second level hospital. METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive study was made with all patients with diabetic foot infection treated with dalbavancin in the Diabetic Foot Unit of Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, covering the period from September 2016 to December 2019. Demographic parameters and comorbidities, characteristics of the infection and treatment with dalbavancin were recorded. The cure rate was estimated at 90 days after finishing the treatment. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients with diabetic foot infection (osteomyelitis) started treatment with dalbavancin, 19 were men and the mean age was 65 years. The microorganisms most frequently isolated for the indication of treatment with dalbavancin were Staphylococcus aureus (11) and Corynebacterium striatum (7). Dalbavancin was used as a second choice therapy in 22 cases, in 11 due to toxicity from other antibiotics. The median duration of treatment was 5 (4-7) weeks; the most frequent dose of dalbavancin (8 patients) was 1000mg followed by 500mg weekly for 5 weeks. 3 patients presented mild side effects (nausea and gastrointestinal discomfort). At 90 days after completion of dalbavancin therapy, 87% (20) of the patients were cured (95% CI: 65.2%-94.52%). CONCLUSION: Patients with osteomyelitis due to gram-positive microorganisms who received as part of the multidisciplinary antibiotic treatment with dalbavancin, had a high rate of cure with adequate tolerance and few side effects. Dalbavancin offers a safe alternative in treating deep diabetic foot infection.

Impacto de la cirugía en la mortalidad de la endocarditis infecciosa en un hospital sin cirugía cardiaca / Impact of surgery on the mortality of infective endocarditis in a hospital without cardiac surgery

INTRODUCCIÓN: La endocarditis infecciosa tiene una alta morbimortalidad y precisa un manejo médico-quirúrgico coordinado. El objetivo fue analizar la mortalidad en un hospital sin cirugía cardiaca. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Evaluación de una cohorte prospectiva de pacientes con endocarditis infecciosa diagnosticada entre agosto de 2011 y enero de 2016 según los criterios de Duke modificados. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 64 pacientes, de los cuales fueron intervenido diecisiete (26,6%). La mortalidad fue 32,8% y se asoció con el antecedente de enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica y la presencia de complicaciones, como la insuficiencia valvular y los embolismos en el sistema nervioso central; la cirugía cardiaca no fue un factor relacionado con la mortalidad. Cuatro pacientes (6,6%) no fueron intervenidos a pesar de tener indicación de cirugía cardiaca. El principal motivo para no ser intervenido fue el mal pronóstico prequirúrgico (44,7%). CONCLUSIONES: La mortalidad por endocarditis infecciosa en un hospital sin cirugía cardíaca es elevada. La complejidad de la patología fortalece la necesidad de equipos multidisciplinarios e interhospitalarios

BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis has a high morbidity and mortality and requires a coordinated medical-surgical management. The objective was to analyse the impact of surgery on mortality in a hospital without cardiac surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Evaluation of a prospective cohort of patients with infective endocarditis diagnosed between August 2011 and January 2016 according to modified Duke's criteria. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were included, of whom seventeen patients were operated (26.6%). Mortality was 32.8% and it was associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease history, staphylococci coagulase-negative and the appearance of complications, as valvular insufficiency and embolisms in the central nervous system; cardiac surgery was not associated with mortality. Four patients (6,6%) were not operated despite indication of cardiac surgery. The main reason for not been intervened was the poor presurgical prognosis (44.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality due to infective endocarditis in a hospital without cardiac surgery is high. The need for interhospital teams is strengthened

Telemedicina, centros penitenciarios y enfermedad por VIH / Telemedicine, prison and illness associated with HIV

OBJETIVOS: Comunicar la actividad de telemedicina, desde su apertura, entre una consulta hospitalaria de enfermedades infecciosas y un centro penitenciario. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio descriptivo de la teleconsulta de enfermedades infecciosas del Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón con el centro penitenciario de Navalcarnero desde 2013 hasta 2017, que se lleva a cabo mediante videoconferencia. Se analizó motivo y número de consultas, diagnóstico de VIH, tratamiento antirretroviral (TAR), situación inmunovirológica, diagnóstico del virus de la hepatitis C (VHC) e intervención realizada por el experto en infecciosas. RESULTADOS: Se valoraron 75 pacientes en un total de 168 consultas (en el primer año 11 consultas y en el quinto 62). El índice de consultas sucesivas/nuevas fue de 1,24 y el 85% de los pacientes requirió menos de 1 año de seguimiento. El 84% de los pacientes no se trasladó al hospital. El 99% de los pacientes aceptó esta modalidad. El 96% era VIH positivo, el 94% de estos tomaba TAR y el 85% tenía carga viral indetectable con 532 CD4/mL de mediana. El 90% tenía serología positiva para VHC. El 72% de las consultas fue para la valoración de tratamiento del VHC, que fue sofosbuvir/ledipasvir en un 63%. Un 40% cambió de TAR (70% para evitar interacciones). CONCLUSIÓN: La mayoría de los pacientes valorados tienen infección por VIH. Esta modalidad de consulta tiene una demanda creciente, es eficiente (evita traslados y es resolutiva) y tiene elevada aceptación. El motivo de consulta más frecuente fue el tratamiento del VHC y más de la tercera parte de los pacientes precisó cambio de TAR

OBJECTIVES: Communicate the activity of telemedicine, from its opening, between a hospital consultation of infectious diseases and a penitentiary center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive study of the tele-consultation of infectious diseases of the Alcorcón Foundation University Hospital with the Navalcarnero penitentiary center from 2013 to 2017, which is carried out by videoconference. The reason and number of consultations, diagnosis of HIV, antiretroviral treatment (ART), immunovirological situation, diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV= and intervention performed by the infectious expert were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 75 patients were evaluated in a total of 168 consultations (in the first year 11 consultations and in the fifth year 62). The index of successive / new consultations was 1.24 and 85% of the patients required less than 1 year of follow-up.84% of patients did not move to the hospital.99% of patients accepted this modality.96% were HIV positive, 94% of them took ART and 85% had undetectable viral load with 532 CD4/mL of medium.90% had positive serology for HCV.72% of the consultations were for the assessment of HCV treatment, which was sofosbuvir/ledipasvir by 63%.40% changed their ART (70% to avoid interactions). CONCLUSION: Most of the evaluated patients have HIV infection. This type of consultation has a growing demand, is efficient (avoids transfers and is decisive) and has high acceptance. The most frequent reason for consultation was the treatment of HCV and more than a third of patients required ART change